barbara findlay Q.C.
  • Home
  • About barbara
    • Awards and Honours
  • Services
    • Family Law >
      • Cohabitation Agreements
      • Poly families
      • Separation Agreements
      • Divorce
      • Adoptions
    • Donor Insemination Agreements
    • Immigration for Lesbians and Gay Men
    • Estates
    • Employment Law and Wrongful Dismissal
    • Equality and Human Rights >
      • Transgender Issues: a Work in Progress
    • What We Don't Do
  • Out/Law Legal Guides
  • Case Chronology
  • Unlearning Oppression
  • Blog
  • Resources
    • Articles
  • Contact

Finally - Canadian divorce available to non-resident queers

8/30/2013

0 Comments

 
Since same sex marriage became legal in Canada ten years ago, non-Canadian queers have been flocking here to marry.

That's all very well:  but what happened if the spouses separated?


They learned to their shock and chagrin that though Canada would marry them, Canada would not divorce them. There was a requirement under the Divorce Act that a person had to be resident in a Canadian province for a year before they could file for divorce- a requirement impossible to meet for many non-Canadians.


The Divorce Act has now been amended to provide that non-residents who married in Canada can get a divorce. The new provisions came into effect August 14, 2013.


The requirements are that the spouses be living apart for at least one yer; neither of them lives in Canada when the divorce is applied for; both of the spouses are now living in a state in which divorce for same sex partners is not available because that state does not recognize same sex marriage.


The application for the divorce must be made in the same province where the marriage was performed.
0 Comments

How would this genderqueer man be treated under B.C. law?

8/24/2013

0 Comments

 
B. Scott was hired to be a fashion reporter on by a California TV network.  But when he came to work wearing what they considered to be "women's clothes" they insisted first that he change into a blazer and slacks and pull his gorgeous long hair into a pony tail; then they terminated him.
Scott is filing a discrimination suit under California law which protects people from discrimination on the basis of gender, and his legal advisors say they expect he will succeed. 
What would happen if that had happened to B.Scott in British Columbia?
It is hard to say.
B.C.'s Human Rights Code offers protection on the basis of 'sex', but there is no explicit protection on the basis of 'gender identity' or 'gender expression'.  This has not been a problem for trans people in B.C. to date, all of whose claims have succeeded on the basis of 'sex' because 'sex' has been interpreted to cover protection for trans people. 
The question is whether this genderqueer man - who identifies as male but presents in "women's" clothing, would be protected, or whether it is necessary to have 'gender expression' specifically listed as a prohibited ground of discrimination.
Because there hasn't been a case like this so far it is impossible to say.  However on the positive side there is a rule that says that human rights law should be given a 'fair, large and liberal' interpretation to protect the most people.  Certainly anyone in this situation should file a human rights complaint on the basis of sex.

For more on this story: http://www.chicagodefender.com/index.php/culture/22787-she-s-the-law-why-b-scott-has-the-right-to-sue-bet-network-for-gender-discrimination-damage-to-reputation


0 Comments

That's not funny!  Or is it?

8/13/2013

1 Comment

 
Picture
What do you think?Should the comedian at Zesty's Restaurant be permitted to harangue a lesbian in the audience by directing homophobic and sexist comments at her? 
Is that "freedom of expression" for the comedian, or "freedom from harassment" for the audience member?
The B.C. Human Rights Tribunal that the comedian, Earle, had violated the Human Rights Code when he included homophobic and sexist zingers in his role as the MC of an open-mic night at Zesty's Restaurant on Commercial Drive in Vancouver.  That decision was recently upheld by the B.C. Supreme Court.  Earle and Zesty's were ordered to pay damage totalling $22,500.
The court held that, while Earle's freedom of expression was infringed, the infringement to protect against harassment on the basis of sex and sexual orientation was legally justifiable.
The case has been a controversial one with many commentators - including for example the queer magazine Xtra - taking the position that the complainants should get a life and find something more important to complain about.
What do you think?


1 Comment

Russian views on homosexuality

8/7/2013

0 Comments

 
Picture
A new Pew survey found that only 16% of Russians say yes to the question "Should homosexuality be accepted".  No wonder the government's homophobic initiative is so popular.
The fascinating survey of attitudes toward homosexuality world-wide shows not only which countries say 'yes' (Canada 80%; Spain 88%, U.S. 60%) and which say 'no' (Nigeria 98%, Uganda 96%, South Korea 59%, China 57%) to the question.
The less religious a country, and the wealthier the country, the more likely it is that the country will have positive attitudes to homosexuality.
See http://www.pewglobal.org/2013/06/04/the-global-divide-on-homosexuality/

0 Comments

Married to an American?  They can take you home now...

8/6/2013

0 Comments

 
Picture
U.S. citizens living abroad with their non-U.S. partners can now bring their partners home with them.
As a followup to last month's announcement permitting lesbian and gay Americans to sponsor their partners for permanent residence, the U.S. has announced that it will extend the same visa rights to same sex partners as to opposite-sex partners.  So Americans can bring their partners home, or travel with them.
For the whole story: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/02/us-usa-gays-visas-idUSBRE9710NT20130802

0 Comments

Trans Parent-cy

8/2/2013

1 Comment

 
To read a recent Ontario decision about the right of a trans parent to see her children, go to H.P. v P.L.C.
In that case, a transwoman was denied permission to see her children at all.
It was eight years since she had last seen her bio-children, conceived before her transition.  During that eight years, she had been convicted of sexual assault on her wife and spent time in jail, where her gender dysphoria was diagnosed and she began her transition.  Her ex-wife had divorced her and remarried.
Despite having an extremely low risk to reoffend, and despite having several glowing letters of support including one from her former father in law, the judge refused to let her see the children.
On the one hand, the judgement rests on standard considerations: the time since she had seen her children, the fact that she had let that time go by without trying to see them; the fact that the children didn't remember her.  On the other hand, the judge's attitude to trans people suffuses the judgement.
Read the case and decide what decision you would have reached if you were the judge.

1 Comment

    RSS Feed

    Subscribe to our blog

    Archives

    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    February 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012

    Categories

    All
    Aboriginal
    Access
    Accountability
    Adoption
    Aids
    Alberta
    Amnesty International
    Apology
    Appeal
    Assisted Human Reproduction Technology
    Bathrooms
    Birth Certificate
    Bisexual
    Board Of Education
    Breast Cancer
    British Columbia
    Broadcast
    Bullying
    Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
    Catholic
    Charter Of Rights
    Charter Of Values
    Child Protection
    Children
    Child Support
    Child Welfare
    Christian
    Citizenship
    Civil Rights
    Civil Union
    Coca Cola
    Colonialism
    Comedy
    Common Law
    Confidentiality
    Courts
    Criminal Law
    Custody
    Depilation
    Disability
    Discrimination
    Divorce
    Donor Insemination
    Education
    Egg Donor
    Egypt
    Employment
    Equality Rights
    Ethnic Origin
    Family Law
    Family Law Act
    Family Relations Act
    Federal Court
    Feminist
    First Nations
    Freedom Of Conscience
    Freedom Of Expression
    Freedom Of Religion
    Freedom Of Speech
    Gay
    Gay Straight Alliance
    Gender Expression
    Gender Identity
    Gender Marker
    Genderqueer
    Genetic
    Genetic Testing
    Greyson
    Harassment
    Harper
    Hate Speech
    Health
    Hiv
    Holocaust
    Homophobia
    Homosexual
    Homosexuality
    House Of Commons
    Human Rights
    Idaho
    Immigration
    International
    Intersex
    Jail
    Jewish
    John Baird
    Judge
    Kansas
    Kenya
    Kris Wells
    Kuwait
    Law
    Law Society Of Bc
    Law Society Of Ontario
    Leaflet
    Lesbian
    Loubani
    Malaysia
    Marriage
    Mary Bryson
    Medical Plan
    Minority
    Music
    Muslim
    Nepal
    Obama
    Ontario
    Pansexual
    Parenting
    Passport
    Power Of Attorney
    Prejudice
    Pride
    Prison
    Property
    Publication
    Public Opinion
    Quebec
    Queer
    Race
    Racism
    Rae Spoon
    Refugee
    Registered Domestic Partnership
    Religion
    Representation Agreement
    Reproductive Technology
    Research
    Retirement Home
    Russia
    Same Sex
    Same Sex Marriage
    Saskatchewan
    School
    Schools
    Seniors
    Sexism
    Sex Reassignment Surgery
    Sexual Assault
    Sexual Orientation
    Sharia Law
    Sikhism
    Slander
    Social Assistance
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Speaking Out
    Special General Meeting
    Sperm Donor
    Spousal Sponsorship
    Spousal Support
    Sun Dance
    Supreme Court Of Canada
    Surrogacy
    Surrogate Mother
    Tarek Loubani
    Tenancy
    Tennessee
    Three Parents
    Trans Alliance Society
    Transgender
    Transition
    Transsexual
    Trinity Western University
    Tweet
    TWU
    Uganda
    United States
    Viet Nam
    Visa
    Voice Therapy
    Washroom
    Wills

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
Photos used under Creative Commons from phalinn, quinn.anya, tedeytan, ToGa Wanderings, Jason Spaceman, Tim Reckmann | a59.de, Enokson, Abulic Monkey, Nina Matthews Photography, _DarkGuru_, Gribiche, whiteafrican, Sweet One, jk+too, Stephane Gaudry, DonkeyHotey, Moon Wolfe