barbara findlay Q.C.
  • Home
  • About barbara
    • Awards and Honours
  • Services
    • Family Law >
      • Cohabitation Agreements
      • Poly families
      • Separation Agreements
      • Divorce
      • Adoptions
    • Donor Insemination Agreements
    • Immigration for Lesbians and Gay Men
    • Estates
    • Employment Law and Wrongful Dismissal
    • Equality and Human Rights >
      • Transgender Issues: a Work in Progress
    • What We Don't Do
  • Out/Law Legal Guides
  • Case Chronology
  • Unlearning Oppression
  • Blog
  • Resources
    • Articles
  • Contact

Rainbow Fund - legacy for queer seniors home

10/31/2012

0 Comments

 
Picture
The Vancouver Foundation newsletter which I received today describes a bequest to them by two gay men who left money to the Foundation for a "Rainbow Fund" to create a seniors' home for LBGT people.

What a great idea, when you are writing your will...

0 Comments

Canada is suspicious of spouses sponsoring their partners

10/31/2012

0 Comments

 
Picture
Immigration Canada believes that there are "thousands" of fraudulent marriages between Canadian citizens or permanent residents and non-Canadians, and so they are tightening the rules.

Effective immediately, you are allowed to "sponsor" your spouse - defined to include your married partner, someone you have been living with for two years (a common law partner), or someone you are unable to live with because of the laws or social context in your respective countries (for example, consider a Muslim from Iran who is in a relationship with a Canadian: the two cannot live together as spouses in Iran; and Canada may deny a visitor visa).

But now, says Canada, there are two new requirements.  According to Jason Kenney, these new requirements are designed to stem fraud arsing out of fraudulent relationships in which a couple marries solely for the purpose of bringing the non-Canadian to Canada, sometimes for a fee.

The first requirement relates to you only if when you made your application for spousal sponsorship, you had NOT been living together for two years AND you have no children.  In that situation, the law now requires that you live together for two years after you come to Canada. The rule makes an exception if you are in an abusive relationship.  In that case, you should go immediately to your doctor, and report the abuse so it is on record.  Then you should go to a lawyer, or call Immigration Canada, and explain why you have moved out.

The second requirement is that once you are yourself sponsored as a spouse, you cannot sponsor anyone else as your spouse till five years have passed from the date you acquired permanent residency. 

0 Comments

Every single study says LGB's are good parents

10/30/2012

1 Comment

 
Picture
According to Julia A. MacMillan, professor of pediatrics and associate dean for graduate medical education at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, every study ever done over the last 30 years confirms that children are healthiest if raised by two loving parents, regardless of gender.

In an article in today's Baltimore Sun, MacMillan notes  "Every major children's health and welfare organization, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, the Child Welfare League of America, the American Psychological Association, the American Psychiatric Association, the National Association of Social Workers, and the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, confirms that gay parents make good parents. The American Medical Association, the nation's largest and most well respected association of physicians, with a membership of more than 200,000, agrees".  Studies purporting to show that LBG parents are flawed have been completely debunked for their pseudo-scientific methodologies. 

There is currently no research specifically about trans parents. 

1 Comment

U.S. Same Sex Couples One Step Closer to Equality

10/18/2012

0 Comments

 
A federal appeals court in New York struck down part of the Defense of Marriage Act on Thursday and became the first to rule that gays and lesbians are a minority group deserving of special protection from discrimination under the Constitution.

Unlike Canada, the U.S. does not have a clause in its constitution specifically guaranteeing equality rights; but courts have held that laws which discriminate on the basis of gender or race should be subject to "strict scrutiny"; that usually results in discriminatory laws being struck down.

The case decided today concerned a tax assessment levied when a New York lesbian died, leaving her estate to her spouse.  The two had married in Canada and lived in New York where same sex marriage is permitted.

The court held that the widow cannot be forced to pay the federal estate taxes.

This battle parallels Canadian claims for "spousal benefits" which were fought and won for about a decade before same sex marriage was achieved here.  Obama has refused to defend the "Defense of Marriage Act" - the homophobic federal legislation denying recognition to same sex marriage.  So the widow's opponents were funded by House Republicans in court. 
0 Comments

HIV Disclosure: Whose Right to Know? Whose Duty to Tell?

10/15/2012

0 Comments

 
An individual has a duty to advise a sexual partner if the individual is HIV+.  If they fail to advise their partner of their HIV+ status, they can be charged with sexual assault or even aggravated sexual assault.
What if a lawyer learns that her client is HIV+, something that the police and prosecutors don't know?  In a recent case, an Ontario court held that a lawyer had a duty to disclose that status, even though her client's communication with her was protected by solicitor/client privilege.  Solicitor client privilege does not apply if disclosure of a client's confidential information would prevent a crime.  The court held that this rule applies, and the lawyer correctly disclosed her client's confidential information about their HIV status to the Crown prosecutor.  To watch an interesting video about this case, go to http://www.lawtimesnews.com/videos/hiv-and-the-law.
The case is a worrying one.  On the one hand, it is hard to argue against protecting prospective sexual partners of an individual from having sex not knowing of the client's HIV status. On the other hand, if HIV+ clients cannot tell their lawyers of their sero-status without risking disclosure to the Crown or the police, no HIV+ person would ever disclose their status to their lawyer. In turn that means that an HIV+ person is denied access to legal advice and representation, since their lawyer cannot advise them properly without all the facts.
In two other cases, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled on October 5 about what a person's duty is to her or his sexual partner if she or he is HIV+.  The underlying principle is that you cannot truly consent to have sex with someone, if they are HIV+ and have not told you.  The failure to disclose vitiates your consent to the sexual act, and can turn consensual sex into sexual assault.
The Supreme Court of Canada says in its October 5 decisions ( ​R. v. Mabior [2012] S.C.J. No. 47 and R. v. D.C. [2012] S.C.J. No. 48) said that an accused does not have to disclose his or her HIV status if there is a low risk of transmission for HIV - for example, where a person has a low viral load AND uses a condom.  The conviction of one of the accused was overturned in the case in which he had a low viral load and used a condom; but permitted to stand in the case where he had a low viral load but did not use a condom.
Defence lawyers are concerned because the ruling appears to put an onus on the accused to show that he or she had a low risk of transmitting HIV when he or she had sex.  It is a basic principle of criminal law that the Crown has to prove that  a person committed a crime, and 'reverse onus' provisions such as this generally offend the Charter rights of an accused individual.
The takeaway lesson?  If you are HIV positive, do the following:  1.  Get your doctor to tell you whether or not you have a low risk of transmitting the virus.  That way, you can later show that you had an honest and reasonable belief that your risk of transmission was low.  2.  ALWAYS use a condom.  3.  To be on the safest side, or i...tell your partner you are HIV+.
0 Comments

What is it about the bathrooms???

10/4/2012

0 Comments

 
Bill C-279, which passed second reading in June 2012, would amend human rights legislation to add 'gender identity' to the list of protected grounds.  (While trans people have been consistently successful with human rights complaints on the ground of 'sex', adding 'gender identity' makes it clear to the public that transpeople are protected by human rights laws).

Christine Molloy reports that Calgary MP Rob Anders (Calgary West) has told his constituents and his church pastor that passage of the bill would allow 'transgender men' (he means transwomen) to have access to women's washrooms.

Jan Buterman, a trans advocate, and Christine Molloy both argue correctly that an objection to trans people using the washroom appropriate to their gender identity is based on the assumption that trans people are likely to act inappropriately in the washroom:  a quintessentially transphobic argument.

Write your MP and dissociate yourself from these transphobic arguments; and tell your MP to support Bill C-279.
0 Comments

California bans 'reparative therapy'; Christians sue to get it back

10/2/2012

0 Comments

 
This week California  passed a law banning so-called 'reparative therapy', the first law of its kind in the world.  The goal of reparative therapy is to turn gay and lesbian people straight. It has done immeasurable harm to queers who have undergone the therapy; often they have committed suicide.
The psychiatrist who first published articles saying that sexual orientation could be changed by therapy has since publicly renounced that position and said that he was mistaken, and apologized for the harm he has done.
But today a Christian group has filed suit to overturn the California law, saying that banning reparative therapy breaches the constitutional right to freedom of speech. 
0 Comments

Queers and Drug/Alcohol Use

10/2/2012

0 Comments

 
 A study conducted by the Manchester-based Lesbian and Gay Foundation (LGF) in partnership with the University of Central Lancashire (UCLAN) investigated the use of alcohol and drugs by over 4,000 LGB people found over a fifth of respondents scored as dependent on a substance, and a quarter showed at least one indicator of dependency.
0 Comments

When an employer turns a blind eye to sexual harassment - watch what happens

10/2/2012

1 Comment

 
Lombardi's life at  Midas Auto Services Experts was hell for  Paul Lombardi, a gay man employed as a Service Advisor, after he was transferred to the Oshawa store in July 2008. He was taunted and harassed, including through text messages.  Finally he blew up. Lombardi  was fired on October 31, 2009, allegedly because he had got into a physical fight with a technician on the job. He filed a human rights complaint.

The Tribunal found that the conduct in the workplace included:

-         harassment on the grounds of disability and sex, largely through text messages and remarks

-         that the harassment and ongoing depression that resulted were partly responsible for the applicant’s involvement in the fight that led to his termination

The Tribunal held that the employer knew of the harassment, but had done nothing to deal with the situation.

The Tribunal awarded Lombardi $20,000 in general damages for pain and suffering, AND compensation for his salary, benefits and vacation pay from October 31, 2009, to August 31, 2010.

The lesson for employees:  you should tell your supervisor if you are being harassed.  The employer has a duty to investigate the situation and deal with the harasser (and NOT by transferring or demoting you out of the workplace!)

The lesson for employers:  harassment between co-workers must be addressed immediately.  There must be a zero tolerance policy.  And if the employer finds out that one employee is harassing another, the employer must deal with the harasser, not transfer the harassee - otherwise, the harassee is being made to pay for the harassment. 

(Ontario Human Rights Tribunal Decision: Lombardi v Walton Enterprises (c.o.b. Midas Auto Services Experts)
 
1 Comment

    RSS Feed

    Subscribe to our blog

    Archives

    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    February 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012

    Categories

    All
    Aboriginal
    Access
    Accountability
    Adoption
    Aids
    Alberta
    Amnesty International
    Apology
    Appeal
    Assisted Human Reproduction Technology
    Bathrooms
    Birth Certificate
    Bisexual
    Board Of Education
    Breast Cancer
    British Columbia
    Broadcast
    Bullying
    Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
    Catholic
    Charter Of Rights
    Charter Of Values
    Child Protection
    Children
    Child Support
    Child Welfare
    Christian
    Citizenship
    Civil Rights
    Civil Union
    Coca Cola
    Colonialism
    Comedy
    Common Law
    Confidentiality
    Courts
    Criminal Law
    Custody
    Depilation
    Disability
    Discrimination
    Divorce
    Donor Insemination
    Education
    Egg Donor
    Egypt
    Employment
    Equality Rights
    Ethnic Origin
    Family Law
    Family Law Act
    Family Relations Act
    Federal Court
    Feminist
    First Nations
    Freedom Of Conscience
    Freedom Of Expression
    Freedom Of Religion
    Freedom Of Speech
    Gay
    Gay Straight Alliance
    Gender Expression
    Gender Identity
    Gender Marker
    Genderqueer
    Genetic
    Genetic Testing
    Greyson
    Harassment
    Harper
    Hate Speech
    Health
    Hiv
    Holocaust
    Homophobia
    Homosexual
    Homosexuality
    House Of Commons
    Human Rights
    Idaho
    Immigration
    International
    Intersex
    Jail
    Jewish
    John Baird
    Judge
    Kansas
    Kenya
    Kris Wells
    Kuwait
    Law
    Law Society Of Bc
    Law Society Of Ontario
    Leaflet
    Lesbian
    Loubani
    Malaysia
    Marriage
    Mary Bryson
    Medical Plan
    Minority
    Music
    Muslim
    Nepal
    Obama
    Ontario
    Pansexual
    Parenting
    Passport
    Power Of Attorney
    Prejudice
    Pride
    Prison
    Property
    Publication
    Public Opinion
    Quebec
    Queer
    Race
    Racism
    Rae Spoon
    Refugee
    Registered Domestic Partnership
    Religion
    Representation Agreement
    Reproductive Technology
    Research
    Retirement Home
    Russia
    Same Sex
    Same Sex Marriage
    Saskatchewan
    School
    Schools
    Seniors
    Sexism
    Sex Reassignment Surgery
    Sexual Assault
    Sexual Orientation
    Sharia Law
    Sikhism
    Slander
    Social Assistance
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Speaking Out
    Special General Meeting
    Sperm Donor
    Spousal Sponsorship
    Spousal Support
    Sun Dance
    Supreme Court Of Canada
    Surrogacy
    Surrogate Mother
    Tarek Loubani
    Tenancy
    Tennessee
    Three Parents
    Trans Alliance Society
    Transgender
    Transition
    Transsexual
    Trinity Western University
    Tweet
    TWU
    Uganda
    United States
    Viet Nam
    Visa
    Voice Therapy
    Washroom
    Wills

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
Photos used under Creative Commons from phalinn, quinn.anya, tedeytan, ToGa Wanderings, Jason Spaceman, Tim Reckmann | a59.de, Enokson, Abulic Monkey, Nina Matthews Photography, _DarkGuru_, Gribiche, whiteafrican, Sweet One, jk+too, Stephane Gaudry, DonkeyHotey, Moon Wolfe